you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]emptiedriver 16 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

seriously, it is hilarious they put people down for being "vagina fetishists" but at the same time make such a point of "not kink shaming" - clearly they do not actually believe that a lesbian or a straight man is a "fetishist" since then they would not be so shamed for this preference!

No, it's just for some reason a moral shame they can allow - it's unacceptable to shame someone for rape fantasies, but to shame them for desiring a penis consensually is okay? It's terrible to shame someone for identifying as a person who chokes and dominates but you can shame them if they identify as someone who clitorally stimulates? If they actually listed the facts in their own words and compared ideas rationally they would see how ridiculous it all was but that's not how these things work...

[–]SanityIsGC[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

You're right there is no consistency in their thinking so that throws a wrench into my idea. It was that "no kink shaming" phrase that made me wonder whether LGB could get their own spaces and stop being harassed by identifying themselves as people with a particular kink and that kink ought to be respected.

[–]lairacunda 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Would it were that simple!