Ironically, his style resembles those of some of the worst postmodernists. Tons of run-on sentences:

In few examples could it be more stark than in the effort to argue that two and two aren’t necessarily four that the objective of the postmodernism at the heart of the present Critical Social Justice (or “Woke”) movement is to destabilize any sense of solidity and meaning and then to use the ensuing confusion to advance a particular form of radical politics.

Tons of superfluous clauses, adverbs, adjectives:

The story actually starts in a private text dialogue with someone who was asking me specifically about how postmodernism thinks about objective claims about the world. She asked, at some point, what postmodernists would say...

Two of the things I love about mathematics are its delightful, head-twisting weirdness and constant examination of its assumptions. These are embodied in the Russell paradox, which began an overhaul of the subject's philosophical foundations during the 20th century. Critical theorists who think themselves radical by asking 'is 2 + 2 always 4?' are unaware of the constant critiquing of mathematical assumptions by mathematicians.