you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LilianH 29 insightful - 1 fun29 insightful - 0 fun30 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

They are tagging anyone they deem "anti-trans" and tracking you about reddit to get you banned and stop you from creating subs etc.

[–][deleted] 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Yes. It’s like they’re branding you if you go on a so-called “hate sub” EVER!

[–]venecia 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

That's funny, because the admins have been telling us mods in a mainstream woman's subreddit that subreddit participation is NOT an acceptable reason to ban the user, and could result in us being removed. We are allowed to ban, say, a poster on T_D (before it got the axe) ONLY if they break the rules, not a moment before.

The idea was that nobody should be branded a bad-faith user simply based off subreddit participation. Back when reddit gave a shit about assuming good faith.

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They're full of crap, because in the threads where they mention PCOS, the activists specifically talk about how "GC posters go to that sub" and how they want to shut it down/ muck it up for that very reason.

[–]yamashita 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Hmm...so if we flood the TRA subs, what happens then?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No idea. I don't plan on going back there regardless aside from viewing the drama going on.

[–]Coconaut[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

“In theory”, reddit admins would have written criteria for reasons that they would ban a sub, and only act if a sub met those criteria. AHS whiners could complain all they want, but it wouldn’t matter if the sub didn’t meet the criteria. “In theory”.