you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]100_percent_truth 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think you can be GC without being a rad fem. But the opposite may not be true.

[–]Anna_Nym[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's how I understand it, too. Like I now consider myself GC because I sign onto most of what's written on the sidebar of this site. But I don't consider myself to be a rad fem.

Although since radical feminism had already fallen out of favor when I was in university, I also don't know that much about it. My impression of it was that radical feminism views heterosexual interaction as intrinsically falling along the oppressed/oppressor model, which I do not agree with. But maybe that's an oversimplification of the patriarchy model?