Should GC feminists stop associating with conservatives on topics in which they’re interests are aligned?

submitted by HeimdeklediROAR from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Radical feminism and gender critical feminism exist outside of the American political dichotomy and so it’s weird to associate the two so much.

There is no American right wing in Australia.

I’d say it’s pretty weird to say that if a radfem speaks on the one platform that will allow her to speak, a republican one, she’s now right wing but whenever a TRA is outed as a pedo or rapist they are immediately disconnected from the platform and are to be spoken about as an individual with individually bad ideas.

Why is a woman speaking next to a shitty man grounds for her to be a bad woman but a bad man representing your interests is an individual not representative of the group?

[–]HeimdeklediROAR[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Note: Yes I know it’s been a long time

The American political dichotomy doesn’t even really exist in America, but I’m being general with my use of terms. Do you not think that Australia has political groups who share many of the same values as american ones? Perhaps in some way influenced by conservative religious groups found in both countries?

I didn’t say she was a bad woman, I asked if she’s being inefficient in her activism by making people who want to take away her rights look better to the voting populace.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Way to miss my entire point and divert to political party naming nuances, and nitpicking over not quoting you verbatim and using the word bad instead.

Can you respond to my point instead of this dithering over my language, please.

She can’t be any more efficient when she’s being actively deplatformed and you know that.

How is taking advantage of the last float you can reach legitimising or lending anything at all to the float?

Again, why does this woman lose her individuality and become a “right-wing” person by speaking on their platform when we can all agree that the people who support “liberal” platforms are not all complicit in the actions of individuals like Alok Venon or Christine Chandler or John Money?