Qt, Why is gender so important?

submitted by HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

Yes you. Who else? You could have participated in the debate and actually answered the question I initially posed, you could have continued to lurk, but you specifically decided to post a complaint that achieves nothing other than the exact sort of boast of moral superiority that you claimed I displayed.

I honestly dunno how that was unclear at all.

Repeating yourself with the “running off the qts” bit isn’t making it true. I personally have hobbies, you personally need a better one than lurking and coming out of the woodwork only to make an ass of yourself by doing the very act of performative superiority you’re having a sook about.

You (personally) should have thought a little bit more.

[–]beris😎 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (14 children)

Why would i answer a question not directed toward me? I think 'gender' is a load of bull, but if it lets trans people express themselves without denying biological fact then cool, good for them.

My complaint achieves exactly as much as yours does, or is yours actually magically better somehow? I'm not claiming moral superiority, just chuckling at how wildly laughable your "oh no i guess my points are too strong for the mean transes to debate me" comment is in a sub with no trans people left who arent licking boots.

Repeating yourself with the “running off the qts” bit isn’t making it true.

Correct. My repeating doesn't make it true. It just IS true. Or are you telling me they dont want to stay in a hostile 10-1 against them space with zero moderation on their behalf because they understand how much smarter you are than them and they'll never be able to beat you in an entirely unrigged internet debate?

You (personally) should have thought a little bit more.

The jab doesn't work unless you follow through with it all the way. You even literally said 'you personally' earlier in your post. Be consistent if you're gonna try to clap back, come on.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Lol you’ll work it out eventually. Maybe try not insulting people you’re not trying futilely to start a fight with, though. The hostility of “boot lickers” really detracts from the holier-than-thou act you started off with.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (12 children)

Ah, sorry, should i have called them "the good ones"? Never seen that in terrible context before.

And cute you've got no response to the fact that your qt posters have been gone for months. Love to know how im wrong though.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

Aww you really think you were making some excellent points dontcha?

Even the worst qt posters were less obvious about trying to start a fight. Get your conflict fix somewhere else, love.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

"I don't have an answer for you".

Paraphrased for you.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Nope just not engaging in the fight you’re very obviously looking to start. An environment where people are not punished for disagreeing with you is not a hostile environment. We are not obliged to follow gender theory to debate gender theorists. Having a big mad about that is not the dunk on us you’re acting like it is.

A hostile environment would be one where it was acceptable to call users slurs like “tranny” or “trap” or other nasty dehumanising language. It would be acceptable to simply make posts saying things like “trans women are all rapists”

Hostility is far more than simply refusal to be governed by a peer.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (8 children)

Ah, is the lady who posted "qt only posts to be mean" to the thunderous applause of the now 100% gc sub above such frivolity?

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Your feelings are way too hurt over some mild snark about how many qt posters only ever respond in threads when they get to throw the word bigot around lol.

For a lurker you don’t seem to read anything qt has posted

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

They don't 'only ever' respond at all now though. :)

And for the record, qt posters aren't angels either. At the very least im of the opinion void/whatevertheywerecalledbeforeistartedlurking should have absolutely been banned.

I just can't get over how high and mighty you all are, don't worry, my feelings are very much still mostly intact!

And for all your aloof attitude about me, changing your flair for me is about the nicest thing anyone has ever done, so thanks for that.