you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

Aww you really think you were making some excellent points dontcha?

Even the worst qt posters were less obvious about trying to start a fight. Get your conflict fix somewhere else, love.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

"I don't have an answer for you".

Paraphrased for you.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Nope just not engaging in the fight you’re very obviously looking to start. An environment where people are not punished for disagreeing with you is not a hostile environment. We are not obliged to follow gender theory to debate gender theorists. Having a big mad about that is not the dunk on us you’re acting like it is.

A hostile environment would be one where it was acceptable to call users slurs like “tranny” or “trap” or other nasty dehumanising language. It would be acceptable to simply make posts saying things like “trans women are all rapists”

Hostility is far more than simply refusal to be governed by a peer.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (8 children)

Ah, is the lady who posted "qt only posts to be mean" to the thunderous applause of the now 100% gc sub above such frivolity?

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Your feelings are way too hurt over some mild snark about how many qt posters only ever respond in threads when they get to throw the word bigot around lol.

For a lurker you don’t seem to read anything qt has posted

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

They don't 'only ever' respond at all now though. :)

And for the record, qt posters aren't angels either. At the very least im of the opinion void/whatevertheywerecalledbeforeistartedlurking should have absolutely been banned.

I just can't get over how high and mighty you all are, don't worry, my feelings are very much still mostly intact!

And for all your aloof attitude about me, changing your flair for me is about the nicest thing anyone has ever done, so thanks for that.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

High and mighty says the one claimi mg total moral superiority on an obscure website populated by under ten people and abandoned by the three qt fools who finally got tired of repeating their one debunked argument. Good job. Hopefully you feel very accomplished now, having championed the moral failures of five people who hung around their fellow gcs after the qt users left once they did not get their way with ‘but clownfish! But intersex! But my feelings!’ As arguments.

Ta for the flair, don’t care what you feel about it I just enjoy particularly stupid sentiments.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Oh, don't get me wrong, I used this toxic dump as a source of entertainment, I'm certainly morally bankrupt in that department. Once again, just enjoying the mental gymnastics you're playing.

You cherry picking the shitty qt arguments doesn't absolve the actual ones i've seen posted here. The big radfem group in america basicly being in bed financially with the alt right? I'd say thats valid. That post got literally zero traction though, I wonder why. It certainly can't be that you're all for the most part here to dunk on teens who can't form a coheremt argument to save their lives, can it?

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Oh cute so now I’m responsible for American alt right cause I don’t go to gender church lmao, or am I responsible for what posts get traction here? What did I do to be declared the face of the sub? Was it saying something you didn’t like as the self appointed moral guidance of the internet?

What a trip. You keep finding new reasons to crown yourself king of this hill like anyone is fighting you for it.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Oh, so you DO understand that individuals don't have responsibility for their group as a whole.

See, I would never have known, since you seem to only think that about yourself.

https://saidit.net/s/GCdebatesQT/comments/8agq/for_people_who_think_bathrooms_should_be/uspy