you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]comradeconradical[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Right, the compromise always has and continues to fall more and more on women (female women lol)

I thought this language would be a bigger compromise for QT as they would need to state sex, but I see now that it's not going to be possible to create new terms to fix this divide in communication or change the way these opposing groups consider things.

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

QT can’t even agree with each other. We can’t compromise (further) with people who can’t even align within their own group. For every qt that acknowledges that TW are male but are also somehow women, you have a dozen that claim that TW are actually female. You have varying definitions of what it means to be trans and who is trans. If they can’t get it together to unify their beliefs, how can anyone whos not qt compromise on anything?