Identity

submitted by loveSloaneDebate King from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]circlingmyownvoid2 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Who cares? Why should law define the way people are. It should be the opposite if anything.

[–]loveSloaneDebate King[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Lmao

So if a kid is outside of school waiting to be picked up, any one who claims to be their mother can just take them? Because it doesn’t matter who is actually their mother? As long as the person taking them identifies as their mother?

Do they even have to identify specifically as that particular child’s mother or just as a mother in general?

If you are actually someone’s mother does that mean you can just take whatever child you want and claim it as your own?

How far do you want to take this?

[–]circlingmyownvoid2 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

A mother doesn’t mean their mother and whether that kid thinks of them as their mother is just as big a part.

[–]loveSloaneDebate King[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you do understand that someone saying they are a mother doesn’t make them someone’s mother? Cool.

[–]kwallio 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why should law define the way people are

Says the person of the group demanding the law define intervene on their behalf.