you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

wow then you should be in "ASK GC" which I guess was a sub at the old place until reality became mean and bannable.

You can't on the one hand say to people "this is a debate sub" when we are dismissive of BS, and then also act like it's cool to just interrogate and not debate. You are trolling. That's OK, this really is not used as a debate sub because TRAs and team QT have no valid arguments and never actually debate.

Elsewhere you stated you are surprised at the consistency of the GC view (I'm paraphrasing), well reality is clear once you see it. But I also see when someone articulates it in a less than clear way, the tendency seems to be when they get caught up in some kind of language that is accommodating of the BS, you engage fully using the fuzziness that comes from speaking of things the way QT and TRAs speak of them. You know gender is all BS, regardless of what "gender dysphoria" (better named "sex dysphoria" otherwise where is the incongruity?) or "body dysmorphia" is. You don't say what you think because you know there is no real rationale to any of this. Have fun trolling, kid.

[–]inkling 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Elsewhere you stated you are surprised at the consistency of the GC view (I'm paraphrasing)

No I didnt. I never said anything like this.

[–]FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

you certainly said something very much like that. That's why I stipulated that I'm paraphrasing. You may have deleted it though as you deleted a lot of things.

Good luck trolling and being intellectually dishonest with yourself. You have the freedom to do that, to yourself. We're done here, kid.

[–]BiologyIsReal[M] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

That is enough. You've certainly been engaging in trolling behaviour yourself in this thread. Just say your arguments without breaking the rules.

[–]FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Perhaps I'm unclear on the rules. Can you show me where I'm breaking the rules?

[–]BiologyIsReal[M] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'd think continuely calling someone a troll would qualify as flaming.

[–]FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I only started saying that when I saw what I think is clear evidence of it.