The science of sexual conflict

submitted by theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser from newstatesman.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Lmao did you just ask for a “science paper” proving that your theory needs proof? Bruh come on.

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser[S] 2 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 5 fun -  (5 children)

Lmao did you just ask for a “science paper” proving that your theory needs proof? Bruh come on.

Well this is exactly what they were asking for.

You mean we should ignore calls for science papers?

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Are you being this dense on purpose or should I actually explain this like you’re five cause you truly dont get it?

Im gonna need you to go look up what burden of proof means. You think a pop psych book is science, think actual sources are irrelevant to discussing biology, and want someone to give you a study proving that you have no proof of what you claim.

I have to believe that you’re deliberately being obtuse and aren’t actually an idiot.

What would you do with a “science paper” anyway since you say they’re so irrelevant?

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser[S] 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (3 children)

You think a pop psych book is science

They can be good or bad but they likely all refer to science papers.

I don't think all "pop science" books are bad.

think actual sources are irrelevant to discussing biology,

I think they are relevant.

But science is a hard and this topic in particular is disputed within science.

and want someone to give you a study proving that you have no proof of what you claim.

I want to see a science paper claiming humans are innately blank.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You can think pop sci is good. That does not make it so. Good science is empirically proven and replicable. This does not change just because you prefer the ease of popsci.

Why does a topic being controversial mean that it’s better understood via opinions than by fact? Opinions are literally worthless compared to objective facts.

People in hell want ice water. Go find a study that says it if you want it. Nobody here is claiming it.

You however, claimed evopsych has value. Can you show us any studies that rigorously support this?
See when a claim is made (like, evopsych has validity) it needs to be supported.

I can fart and refer to a “science paper” whatever that’s meant to be. Referring to a study is meaningless. There needs to be a correct understanding of the claims supported by the study, as well as comprehension of specifically how each point of the claim is proven by the study.

If you think some shitty book referring to any old papers the author may or may not have understood is the same as science, I’m sorry but you have no business discussing science.

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser[S] 4 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

See when a claim is made (like, evopsych has validity) it needs to be supported.

I think humans evolved. I think humans have innate psychology (aside from any questions of gender).

I think that psychology is the result of evolution. I don't think it's all random spandrels. As basic as that.

What's the alternative? We are perfect blank animals?

Every time I look into it I see behaviours connected to long linages of animals that go back into eternity.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lmao you’re seriously putting your musings on the same level as actual biology, history, and whatever else.

Are you joking or just dunning Kruger effect on legs