you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkTwainiac 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

No offense, but since the OP asked

Is autogynephilia normal in natal women?

I don't get why you've chosen to post at such length about you you you and other cross-dressing males like you. None of what you've said addresses OP's query or sheds any light on women. You do you - but please stop trying to suggest that what you & other men do constitutes the model for what women do.

[–]adungitit 6 insightful - 8 fun6 insightful - 7 fun7 insightful - 8 fun -  (4 children)

It baffles me why theory of this isn't banned - he constantly engages in textbook male derailing, bioessentialist wanking and the whole male-idiot-act where he asks for people to explain feminism 101 to him over and over and over again, and then quickly changes the topic with unrelated (but always identical and previously answered) questions when his wanking gets called out. Like, are the mods THAT stupid or inexperienced (or both) that they don't recognise textbook male trolling when they see it or is this another attempt to suck up to conservatives or what? Seriously - you've got a man who isn't even trans or QT wanking out answers to questions about female sexuality and telling women that they're actually biologically attracted to alpha chads, and the mods are like "seems legit".

[–]BiologyIsReal[M] 12 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Nobody is trying to suck up to conservatives...

Every single comment comes up with a handy report button, you know? You could have used it to report him rather than insult us.

Also, and I'm saying this because of you comments habits in general, just because this is a debate sub, it doesn't mean you can insult anyone that you disagree with. So, I suggest you too try to follow the rules.

[–]MarkTwainiac 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think theory_of's posts are excellent illustrations of the kind of self-centered, sexist, misogynistic, myopic, dick-obsessed thinking of male and male-centering genderists that women & "GC" people are up against.

[–]adungitit 3 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

You can say that about any man. The point isn't that men are plagued by self-centered, sexist, misogynistic, myopic, dick-obsessed thinking. We know that, that's like, feminism 101. We don't need even more demonstrations of it from men who have nothing else to offer. The point is in how this kind of thinking is used in liberal-aligned trans communities, how they specifically try to rationalise it, how it relates to defining gender and how they can possibly make it compatible with feminism. If I just wanted to debate your average male misogynist, I'd go to a MRA debate sub, or just turn to the first man on the street.

[–]peakingatthemomentTranssexual (natal male), HSTS[M] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Please note you have the capacity to block users. Use it as liberally as needed to maintain your well-being.

This would be my recommendation if a user really bothers you or use the report function. Insulting the mods probably won’t be effective.

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 3 insightful - 7 fun3 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 7 fun -  (1 child)

Well we're hear to discuss things, share opinions and experiences. I thought it was relevant.

[–]MarkTwainiac 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, we are all here to discuss, share, disagree, argue... But not all threads have the same focus.

I'm not trying to be a jerk, but I honestly don't get why your post about you you you and other males like you is relevant to the topic of this one particular thread. Which is about this question:

Is autogynephilia normal in natal women?