you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]divingrightintowork 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Why would we care what other women do with their selves, or if they don't want to call their selves women anymore? Though if men have issue with women invading their intimate spaces, say women wearing shirts that say things like "three hole faggot," flooding gay bars and complaining about the transmisandry... we will stan for them and support them in keeping their spaces sex segregated and hope they'll do the same for us.

[–]GenderbenderShe/her/hers[S] 1 insightful - 6 fun1 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 6 fun -  (3 children)

But GC feminists often say men's issues are not feminist issues, talk about how awful AMAB men are and don't defend men. Yet when trans men are "infiltrating" cis men's spaces, suddenly GCs stick up for them. I thought men's issues are not feminist issues? It just shows one of their main goals is to be anti-trans.

[–]divingrightintowork 7 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 6 fun -  (2 children)

Do you understand what allyship is, yes or no? Women can understand and empathize with disregard for personal boundaries on the basis of sex.

[–]GenderbenderShe/her/hers[S] 1 insightful - 6 fun1 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

Yes I understand what allyship is. Also, members of the marginalized group get to decide if you're an ally to them, not you. This includes trans men.

[–]divingrightintowork 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

OK? I have no issue not stanning for TMs if they don't want to be included under my feminism. Not really sure what your'e saying / what it has to do with the original response that wasn't addressed already.