QT: Do you understand why women need single sex spaces?

submitted by Penultimate_Penance from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I think locker rooms should also have stalls because there are people who are uncomfortable changing in front of others regardless of the sex of everyone in the facility

Last comment I’ll make until I see new comments:

there’s a huge difference between an individual being uncomfortable changing in front of anyone and a female uncomfortable changing around males.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Interesting how quickly and easily gb dismisses discomfort she doesn’t experience but other women do, when she argues that men’s feelings about womanhood aren’t considered enough by gc/radical feminists.

No empathy or tolerance there for women whatsoever.

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That’s what’s baffling to me.

Like- fuck the rights, privacy, safety, sense of safety, and comfort of women and girls, men’s feelings are on the line! It’s just a stance I will never understand.

What bothers me most when women act all “pick me” towards transwomen is that they are so willing to sacrifice the rights and needs of slightly over 50% of the population for less than 1% of males. And they are willing to do this based on an ideology that not only can’t be proven, but is so easily disproven. It’s absurd to me.

And for GB’s justification to always seem to boil down to “well, I’m personally not bothered by it” and “I personally believe in tra rhetoric” just makes it that much worse.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Always, always ‘well I’m not bothered so you need to feel differently about xyz’ from gb. It’s amazing how far liberal feminists will go in terms of undermining their own interests and the interests of other women in order to be socially acceptable to a group of men.

It’s incomprehensible, cutting off her nose to spite her face but her face here is women’s rights. Like..I guess fuck elderly women, religious women, shy women, or any other woman who isn’t okay with having men in every conceivable space there is.

Gotta admire the dedication to faith I guess? When belief trumps decades of crime stats and the words of a million other women it’s some damn deep faith

[–][deleted] 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

‘well I’m not bothered so you need to feel differently about xyz’

AKA luxury beliefs ("concessions from thee, but not from me" -- often because the holder of the belief is among those least likely to actually have to use unisex locker rooms; they have alternatives).