you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]worried19 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I don't think of same-sex couples as fundamentally different from opposite-sex couples, minus the reproduction aspect. If I were a guy and with my partner as a guy, I can't see our relationship being any different from how it is now. Maybe we'd have sex a different way, but the basis of our relationship would be the same in terms of friendship, companionship, intimacy, teamwork, etc.

I'm sure I'm not a typical example, but I don't believe there is any gendered aspect to my relationship with my partner. In my eyes, our dynamic is irrelevant to our respective biological sexes.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I don't think of same-sex couples as fundamentally different from opposite-sex couples, minus the reproduction aspect. If I were a guy and with my partner as a guy, I can't see our relationship being any different from how it is now. Maybe we'd have sex a different way, but the basis of our relationship would be the same in terms of friendship, companionship, intimacy, teamwork, etc.

The reproduction aspect is perhaps being made as more important than it really is by virtue of this being a heteronormative world that encourages a viewpoint of heterosexual supremacy. The idea that as animals, reproduction is somehow more important than friendship, companionship, intimacy, teamwork, etc. seems to make the most sense when looking at things clinically. I like the way you're seeing and interpreting this, though.

I'm sure I'm not a typical example, but I don't believe there is any gendered aspect to my relationship with my partner. In my eyes, our dynamic is irrelevant to our respective biological sexes.

That's a very interesting way of looking at your relationship. You're not discounting the attraction to the person based on sex, but you're giving the overall humanity precedence, and I quite like that. I would hope it were a more typical example than not, that seems quite healthy and something admirable to strive for.

[–]worried19 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well, if you're looking at it strictly from a biological perspective, every species is designed to reproduce. But that doesn't mean that all individual members of that species have to reproduce. And it doesn't mean that the ability to reproduce makes heterosexual couples superior over others. Straight couples can reproduce and be negligent or harmful to their offspring. The ability to create life doesn't mean that you're able to properly nurture life.

That's a very interesting way of looking at your relationship. You're not discounting the attraction to the person based on sex, but you're giving the overall humanity precedence, and I quite like that.

Thanks. Yeah, I'm attracted to my partner because of his biological sex (that's obviously a crucial aspect for sexual attraction), but it's about much more than that. I'm not attracted just to any person with a male body. I'm attracted to him also because of who he is as a person and how he relates to me. I think we relate as individuals, not as representatives of our biological sexes.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I may have gotten carried away in emphasizing the importance of biological realities. And that's a very good point about creating life vs nurturing life. You've given me quite a bit to think on.