I think that the “sexual inversion” that you’re talking about is something that would occur on any body by chance. I don’t see how that would be a trans specific thing, which is what your initial comment seemed to suggest. Rather, it would be a thing that just happens to some people based on genetics/what features they inherited from their parents, and that if someone happened to be trans, they’d interpret as a sign they were meant to transition. But the way you phrased your first comment gave me (and I think a few of us) the impression that you were saying that this was a phenomenon that occurs specifically in trans people.

No, I didn't mean that as a trans-specific thing, thank you for picking up on that and clarifying.

However, I don’t think having developed some typically opposite sex features is ever going to mean someone naturally developed so many of those features that they are a able to really see themselves as a member of the opposite sex. I just don’t know what features someone could develop that would logically support that. I think that people who transition have a mental health issue, but I think someone convincing themselves that because one to a few features on their body is more aligned with the opposite sex means they are trapped in the wrong body would be more deeply mentally ill than the average dysphoric person. There’s just no feature typical of a woman that a man can naturally develop (or vice versa) that I think would reasonably justify that thought process.

I don't think those features alone, no matter how numerous, could cause a person to see themselves as the opposite sex, either. I think that things like that might help convince a person in light of other circumstances and events and experiences, all things interplaying to eventually tip the scales in favor of transsexualism, but a slew of physical features alone would likely never be enough to do that. If that were to happen, I agree, they would likely be more mentally ill than the average dysphoric person.

Yes secondary sex characteristics can vary- that’s why they are secondary, and we define and observe by primary. Still- someone would have to develop significantly more secondary features typical of the opposite sex than their own for it to make sense that having those features changes their perspective and experience in life, unless they were several mentally ill. And even then, them convincing themselves doesn’t do much to make the idea in their head a logically sound one. I understand what you’re saying now, but initially it did sound as if you were implying that trans people, specifically children, somehow have the possibility of naturally developing physically more in line with the sex they’ll eventually want to transition to appear as, and that doing so informs their perspective. That doesn’t seem to be what you’re saying now. Now it sounds like you’re saying that a trans person may cling to any feature(s) they naturally developed that is typically associated with the opposite sex as a sign or proof that they were meant to transition, even though the rest of their body and features are typical of their sex?

I don't think the features themselves actually affect the perception, but rather society's reaction to those features and the judgement and interpretation by others that affect the perception of just having those features. And I'm sorry for probably causing even more confusion now, but I am actually saying both, because I think both ideas are actually the same: one is the objective perception, one is the subjective perception. They are the same thing, but the interpretation differs between the outside observer and the observed. The outside observer will rightfully see a mental illness, the observed will not. They may come to understand that they have a mental illness, but so long as they maintained the conviction of a cross-sex identity, they will never be able to see their illness as the outside observer does--I would think if they could, they would probably not be able to maintain such an identity as strongly as they do.

I sort of understand the lucidity that might actually be able to occur. To have a moment of such security to relieve homophobia entirely that it wouldn't really matter whether they were a woman or man, and in fact could be OK with openly acknowledging one's sex and one's sexual orientation. An LGB person comes to have peace with themselves. I'm not sure how much of a cross-sex identity might be resolved in the case of transsexuals, but perhaps the worst parts of the illness could be. Personality would remain, but the illusion would disappear. But that's just curious wondering on my part.