you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HeimdeklediROAR 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Not really. I don’t consider the use of “male” and “female” to be appropriate when used to describe biology because I believe that sex is a spectrum. Applying it to me therefore is exactly the same as applying “cis” to GC people, as neither of us thinks those terms are being legitimately used (presumably GC has no problems with the terms in chemistry). I accept biology and that sex traits exist I just disagree with the binary sex paradigm that classifies that biology into one of two idealized boxes. I would be fine with “female” as a gender term just as I am fine with “women” as a gender term, because again the issue I have is with the use of the terms is trying to apply an ideology that I don’t believe in too me, not the terms in and of themselves.

This is all I’ll say further on the matter as this topic is not the topic of the post, and I don’t want to derail the discussion. No offense of course :)

[–]peakingatthemomentTranssexual (natal male), HSTS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for explaining! I won’t ask anything else.