you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DistantGlimmer 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It could be identity, hormones, document change, or with diagnosed dysphoria per the DSM.

None of which are objective legal criteria. All rely on self-declaration to some extent and are open to abuse and dishonesty.

When it comes to private spaces more spaces could be built. You are claiming there is a fundamental xonfolict when I don’t believe there is even though there could be (Or not) a conflict based on the current status. There needn’t be a conflict.

Building more separate spaces for trans people would be a solution but that goes against gender identity which states that trans people are the gender they say they are and are entitled to those spaces. This is in conflict with sex-based rights which say spaces should be segregated based on biological sex. I don't think trans rights are necessarily in conflict with women's sex-based rights. I specifically used the term gender identity because that is where I think the conflict lies