you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Mostly I think it’s odd that the “inclusive language” only seems to be aimed at female functions...

Like, there are people who complain about the words “dude” and “guys” (as in “hey guys!” being said to a group of people),but it’s very rare to see examples of people throwing a tantrum over male bodily functions being referred to as male bodily functions. I’ve even seen ads for “pregnant people and fathers”... wonder why that is...

[–]GenderbenderShe/her/hers[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

But what if we started demanding inclusive language for male functions?

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Why haven’t “we”? Why do it to women but not men?

[–]loveSloaneDebate King 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think people would just laugh and keep on talking how they always have. And a lot of men would probably peak.