you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SnowAssMan 6 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 6 fun -  (5 children)

Hey you said it, not me

Oh God, the pretend-to-be-stupid technique. This is what I said: You're using the wrong sexist euphemism, you meant to say "SWERFs", not "TERFs", since you're not talking about transgenderism at all

I'm not going to dumb it down for you. Accommodating stupidity (feigned or otherwise) never works. Just read it until you understand it.

No feminist is "trans exclusionary". When the trans movement says "exclusionary" what it means is: inclusion that isn't validating. For instance trans-women are allowed to participate in sports – men's sports = inclusion that isn't validating. The entire female sex is included under single-sex rights that feminists fight to protect, that includes trans people, since two thirds of trans people belong to the female sex.

[–]ANIKAHirsch[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

I'm a trans-exclusionary feminist.

I don't get why you don't own it.

[–]SnowAssMan 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (3 children)

You're only semi-literate, try owning that.

[–]ANIKAHirsch[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

I upvoted because you make me laugh.

[–]SnowAssMan 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Isn't it ironic that you, a man pretending to be a woman, identifies as "trans exclusionary"

[–]ANIKAHirsch[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not a man.