The author's argument lacks logical coherence and clarity. While they assert that maturity is a gradual process, they fail to establish a clear connection between this notion and the proposed cessation of protection and raising of younger individuals. The implication that treating younger people as more mature necessitates denying them opportunities like marriage further undermines the argument's validity. Additionally, their stance on free speech absolutism appears biased and overlooks the potential harms of unfettered expression. The analogy drawn between the left's alleged promotion of credentialism and historical instances of religious control is tenuous and fails to acknowledge the significant differences between these contexts. Overall, the argument presented lacks a coherent structure and fails to provide convincing support for its claims.