Does this seem naive? Copied from Muskys comment on InTheCouds Death Post.

submitted by [deleted] from liquiddeath.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]UbiquitousCultOfSelf 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If ya'all remember a few tiktoks ago when, "little nas" or someone marketed with nike or addidas or who really gives a rip and sold shoes containing someone or other's blood and had pentagrams and triple 6's on them?
Bad marketing, yes. Literal mark of the beast? Nah.

[–]In-the-clouds 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah, I remember those shoes. The shoe was not the mark of the beast, of course, because the mark goes in the right hand or forehead. But the shoe, if it had "triple 6's on them", as you said, then they literally were marked with the number of the beast.

Having blood in shoes is not just bad marketing, but wickedness. The life is in the blood, and whoever sheds a man's blood, by man will his blood be shed.

[–]UbiquitousCultOfSelf 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I appreciate your zealousness, and quoting Scripture is almost always good.
The Word does not return void, right?
But zealousness without knowledge is not good either.
So when you compare the blood, presumably willingly given, in a shoe to the shedding of blood (which meant murder/man slaughter) you're making a mistaken correlation.
Is it wicked, probably. Will blood be shed because people willingly signed over donated blood to be used in the making of those shoes? Not bloody likely.

Keep vigil, keep trying to do His will (G-d's)