What does saidit think of this covid vaccine study? If this is true it's good news, but I'm not sure how to evaluate it myself. Appreciate any comments, context, etc.

submitted by panel30 from saidit.net

all 3 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well its a pre-print, so it hasn't been peer reviewed yet, but there is some trouble with their logic and premise of the study.

They are framing this as 'vaccination' vs 'infection', when this is a false paradigm - People who have been vaccinated still get Covid, so you have to ADD vaccine risk + covid risk to the vaccinated patients. This is not actually an either/or scenario, since this vaccine is NOT sterilizing and does NOT prevent the infection. The vaccinated have two sources of myocarditis risk, the unvaccinated have one.

This study does not appear to be controlling for cases of infection AND vaccination, so at a glance I'd say it has very little value, and their conclusions are misleading

[–]Adventurous_Ad6212 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I think you should trust the science.

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It says it directly causes shocking amounts of grievous, possibly fatal harm? The title is a little odd, but "confirms the harms we knew it causes" really isn't cause for celebration when it's THIS bad.