Is /s/Incels moderator ClownWorld123 going overboard? Do users need to be unbanned or does that sub need new clear rules or guidelines?

submitted by JasonCarswell from saidit.net

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jet199 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

It's fine to ban people you don't like if you aren't on s/all.

No point being on s/all anyway if half the people there can't engage.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

According to the FAQ:

4. Mods must not remove user comments and posts that are on-topic and made in good faith UNLESS one of these conditions are met:

  1. It's clearly stated in the sub's sidebar that the moderators remove opposing opinions AND the mods must uncheck the sub setting "allow this sub to be included in /s/all as well as the default and trending lists" so that the sub won't appear on /s/all.
  2. The name of the sub must ends with "_positive" or "_negative" to clearly indicate the sub's intentional bias, thus allowing the sub to appear on /s/all.

It seems we have to discover by trial and error - or there should be an indicator in the sidebox.