I'm not into your definitions, i actually own mine.

I didn't make the contradictory definitions. You did.

So stop patronizing me.

That was not my intention. I was interested in the OP, and response, and engaged - wondering how you reconcile the contradiction.

It is pathetic and only makes sense in your simuIation, i can sense you simulating.

I don't know how curiosity is pathetic. And I don't know what you mean by simulation. I would have thought by now you'd know I'm human, using my real name, posting real photos and videos, and even doing real freedom stuff in Windsor.

I'm allowed to contradict myself, because i'm actually human, fyi.

I didn't say you couldn't. We're all walking juxtapositions and hypocrites in many ways. But stooping to insults is a weak deflection. You would have done better to simply not answer.

All of saidit should fact-sense my theories, so i can revise them because sense itself only is defineable and judgeable in relation to the context.

Another contradiction. You said don't question your shit, then say all of SaidIt should check out your shit. Your shit is no more important than anyone else's.

And all of the context of this theories isn't "sensable" by you, as you finely proved just now.

Your grammar sucks to the point of being incomprehensible.

You won't control my narrative, so to say. No matter how hard you try to imagine, you can.

I wasn't trying to control anything. I was just seeking clarification from a muddy ghost. You were more insightful and funnier when alive George.