you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]iamonlyoneman 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

censorship, by definition, is a government activity. learn what words mean before attempting to dunk on people better than you

[–]weavilsatemyface 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

censorship, by definition, is a government activity

No it isn't. "Censorship" is the suppression of speech, public communication, or any other information. It doesn't matter who does it, or whether it is justified or not, it is still censorship. That is why we can have

  • government censorship;
  • private censorship (question the official line on Covid vaccines or say that people with penises are not women? Twitter will ban you);
  • academic censorship (challenge the so-called "liberal" establishment narratives in college, and see your job go bye-bye);
  • parental censorship (internet Nannyware);
  • self-censorship (when is the last time you told your boss exactly what you think of him?)

etc. They're all different forms of censorship, whether the government is involved or not.

The so-called "liberal" left is subcontracting out censorship to private companies like Twitter (which is why they went insane when Elon Musk bought control of it) and the mainstream media. The government doesn't need to censor when they can leave it to private industry.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You have been bamboozled. People ignoring and not wanting to boost you are not censorship.

[–]weavilsatemyface 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

People ignoring and not wanting to boost you are not censorship.

I never said it was. Your reading comprehension has failed. Subcontracting out censorship to private companies is not "people ignoring you".

This idea that only government censorship is censorship is as idiotic as the idea that only governments can wage war, as if mercenaries don't exist, as if human tribes haven't waged war on each other for millennia.

Seriously dude, "only governments can censor" is 100% woke propaganda.

[–]Kuasocto 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

by definition

how about you actually look up a dictionary retard? BY DEFINITION censorship doesn't need government at all.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/censorship

also, you're naive as all hell if you think the US companies are not just a proxy for the government. Do you not know the connection between darpa's lifelog and facebook? https://i.postimg.cc/jK2Z26xV/suckerberg.png

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

  • use a trash dictionary
  • find a definition to suit your agenda

many such cases

[–]Kuasocto 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

moving the goalpost

Use any dictionary and you'll get the same result idiot. Stop licking the boots of big tech.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

licking the boots of big tech

LOL i'm old enough to remember when Google changed their definition of fascist to include Trump supporters

[–]Kuasocto 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Which makes you what, 19? Stop this bullshit shooting yourself in the foot with redefining censorship and just use the word normally. It means suppressing, hiding or destroying information, regardless of who does that.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

or you could admit you don't know what it means and leave the room

[–]Kuasocto 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

more indirect defense of big tech

go fuck yourself

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)