SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around?

submitted by JasonCarswell from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (18 children)

LOL.
Normalcy is for normies.
Fringe should have been my middle name - but my parents were normies.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 6 fun -  (15 children)

Yeah I agree with you there. I would like to see no bans. This was done to me every goddamned week on reddit, calls for my ban. It worked eventually.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 5 fun -  (14 children)

Were you breaking the rules?

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (13 children)

There weren't many rules to break. A few people just wanted me gone. This seems very similar.

I wanted to suggest a duel instead, Jas vs. Socko, but there's that pesky no advocating violence rule.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (7 children)

Did you straight up ignore, mock, and belittle the users of Reddit? Did you time and time again make little lies then disappear once someone started calling you out on them?

If so, then no wonder they wanted you gone. If not, then your case is nothing like this one.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

Did I do that here?

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

No, you act like a real human. I doubt you faked Gizmo and all those silly situations Gizmo gets in.

I'm talking about Socks. Obviously your case is different from theirs. It's just similar to yours because an unpopular user is getting piled on. Maybe you did deserve some of your comeuppance, maybe not all. Socks deserves it all, especially that which is done peacefully. This thread is mostly peaceful.

I bet when you were chased out of Reddit it was kind of nasty.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

/s/Terminology/comments/8f81/sealioning_a_harassment_tactic_under_the_guise_of/

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

That's how socks operates.

/s/Terminology/comments/8f81/sealioning_a_harassment_tactic_under_the_guise_of/

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 6 fun -  (2 children)

That Shalom guy did that sealioning to me, really fucking annoying. Easy to spot though

Socks must have fucked the boss's ex wife if he got posted to shill here. I mean, who among us would be swayed?

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Easy to spot though

Not everyone sees it. A nice person with a different opinion is easy to find on SaidIt. It's when they keep up with the bullshit despite the evidence, asking for more and more and more never digesting it, then they're just lying with an agenda. All this takes time, energy, memory, and enough interactions to get a good read. Most folks here don't get all that.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

asking for more and more and more never digesting it, then they're just lying with an agenda.

You must know that this is not me.

It's obvious that every claim you've made against me is something you've done. You and others must know that none of those claims against me are accurate. If you don't know this, there is a serious problem (not a problem for me, however). Moreover, you spend a lot of time focused on your hatred of me. What does that tell you? Leave me alone.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

And the anonymity of socks and the people steering that account, possibly unfairly armed secret agency or military assets.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

I don't see what you see. Seems like one guy writing to me. There should be a way to test that if u/Socks consents. Why don't y'all just yell at each other over the phone for once, that'd go a long way to verifying an actual human being, wouldn't it. Also the idea seems hilarious, maybe record yourselves for our benefit.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It's possible socks is a single bipolar neckbeard asstroll sealion with a selectively low IQ or an agenda, but being so prolific, so forgetful, and with so many moods there's a strong case to be made, as others have, that it's not just one person. I didn't come up with this theory though I may continue to speculate until we have more solid info.

I'm done debating the sealions and asstrolls at length. We need to plan future defenses against armies of them, if/when they decide to brigade uncensored places like this.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

LOL - thanks. Perhaps a polite duel. Instead of 'first blood', perhaps first pwnage, or best in rap battle. (I'm joking). But seriously, Carswell is obviously very angry with me, as he's been for months, and he'll stop at nothing to insult me in every way possible. My view is that this is related to serious personal problems (which I don't say lightly), and the need to bully someone online. He actually knows enough about me - perhaps more than other users know - in order to know that what he claims I am is certainly false. If this is not true, than there is a genuine case of paranoid schizophrenia here, [edit: but I wouldn't know. Many of us on Saidit sometimes aren't playing with a full deck, which is why I think it shouldn't be so easy to ban someone, and it's easier to be banned here than on Reddit, ironically. In any event, we're all sometimes playing chess with pigeons, as noted by a previous visitor.]

[–]Tiwaking 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun - 1 month ago And the anonymity of socks and the people steering that account, possibly unfairly armed secret agency or military assets.

Just do what I do: Assume it is Hilary Clinton and respond accordingly.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

I like talking to socks, as a personal favor would you stop flirting with them so hard, it's making me jealous.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I like talking to socks, as a personal favor would you stop flirting with them so hard, it's making me jealous.

Put it away, zip up, and put your shoes back on, then go get a room. The produce section of a crowded grocery store is not the place to indulge your stocking fetish.