SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around?

submitted by JasonCarswell from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tiwaking 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Censorship is one issue you and I will always agree on

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

It's about the rule breaking, not censorship. It's my fault I wasn't clearer. The fact that they spew poison is bonus if they get removed.

[–]Tiwaking 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Oh Im sorry Jason, I was just replying to Popper that not censoring people is one thing we can agree on. The socks situation isnt censorship, its habitual rule breaking. Rule breaking gets you put in jail, but habitual rule breaking should get you removed.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Oh you are clear. People are just unable to understand anything outside of their own preconceived ideas.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I thought I was, but I shouldn't have brought up their lies and shilling agendas. People get confused easily and understandably defensive about censorship. Sometimes less is more, and I tend to be too verbose for clarity - but it muddied the water.