use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~2 users here now
Ask the community of saidit a question!
SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around?
submitted 2 years ago * by JasonCarswell from self.AskSaidIt
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Questionable 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun - 2 years ago (6 children)
NO. And I refuse to look into 'the drama.' Please feel free to use the report button if you wish. Though I encourage you to use your clear abilities for articulating your points of view in debate instead.
Ĥ̅͛ǝ̮̺͕̲̰llo ʍoɹlp' I,m Qnǝsʇᴉouɐqlǝ.̬̘̟ͅ
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun - 2 years ago (5 children)
I have reported, collected evidence of rule-breaking, and now d3rr won't do anything.
So you like rule-breaking then? If they can do it everyone will start to.
[–]Questionable 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun - 2 years ago (1 child)
I don't like echo chambers based on exclusion, and bans. There are many people I would outright ban if it weren't for my awareness of this slippery slope that leads to.... The creation of current day Reddit.
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
It's not about echo chambers. It's about civil discourse. They are rule breakers. I'd be after them if they were right or centrist or even voluntaryists that broke the rules with downward shit and name-calling.
The fact that they are proven liars, authoritarians, and big pharma shills is a bonus if they get banned for disrupting SaidIt by not obeying rules.
[–]HibikiBlack 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
IMO, too much liberalism can destroy the site just as much as too much authoritarianism. I think Saidit itself is too liberal, but still better than most sites out there. I don't see anything wrong with certain subs enforcing their own rules as long as they keep things limited to their own sub, but it can't get to the point of downright degeneracy. Ultimately, someone would have to force their authority in order to keep the site running. It's a shame Magnora is not here with us and may not really come back.
[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - 2 years ago (1 child)
That spells the end of any site, when the rules are not being enforced. This is the most dire consequence of this type of inaction: for evil to triumph...
Hope is not lost. socks now has 2 strikes.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Questionable 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun - (6 children)
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun - (5 children)
[–]Questionable 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun - (1 child)
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun - (0 children)
[–]HibikiBlack 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - (0 children)
[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - (1 child)
[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun - (0 children)