Users of Saidit: Should subs that don't violate the rules be removed from s/all by the admins?

submitted by Dragonerne from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Dragonerne[S] 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Don't pretend to be a victim persecuted for your political views.

I'll do that when we're given the same treatment as other subs that follow the rules.

Raise a code-bounty and hire a code-jockey to write a new filter feature for SaidIt that allows the top "X" number of posts in your community sub to be allowed on /s/All so that it's no longer limited to all or nothing.

I could write that code. I bet you could too.

The sub is very popular and very active for SaidIt. That is why it's not allowed to dominate /s/All.

No, the admin doesn't like our political views. That's why it is not allowed. The excuse he then gives himself and others is what you're writing here. If he didn't find our views abhorrent, he would have no problem with the 1-3 posts a day that the sub has.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'll do that when we're given the same treatment as other subs that follow the rules.

M7 didn't write down a rule that popular subs can't dominate the /s/All front page, but it's obviously already in place. He could also make a statement about extremist subs too. If he wanted to write any of it down he would have. I don't understand much of his management.

I could write that code. I bet you could too.

Do it!!! And write other stuff and features for SaidIt too.

I don't code.

No, the admin doesn't like our political views. That's why it is not allowed.

False. SaidIt is for most views, including extremist ideas within the law.