So... what was LXXXVIII banned for, anyway?

submitted by Debra_L from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Debra_L[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You're discrediting your own notions of argumentative validity, if you tie them to the person. Ad hominems are frowned upon for good reason. (Actually a bannable offense on SaidIt, BTW.)

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I didn't tie anything. I pointed out I'm flexible enough to agree with socks. Dragging down conversations, as you're doing, is ban-worthy, not ad hominems (especially with M7 unreliable moderation). More importantly, again you avoided the questions.

You are a waste of time.