Saiditors, I've debated what "science" means with one who's allegedly superior with "psience", and others on defining "socialism". I present this matter forward for your feedback on these two processes. If I'm wrong I'll apologize and learn, or they will learn and maybe finally shut up.

submitted by JasonCarswell from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

Thanks so much Tom. I wished more people had weighed in, but maybe /u/Horrux and /u/DffrntDrmmr can learn on their own that both socialism and science are processes, not fixed nouns.

Indeed, democracy can also be the tyranny of the many. You could even argue that in this post I'm trying to bring the many to be tyrants upon these guys until they groupthink properly.

I agree with your socialism outline, including the bit about top-down tyranny. Most folks don't even recognize the 3rd form of socialism, the lateral structure in worker coops, in part because the concept has been kept out of all the propaganda and public discussions.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No, both are fixed nouns AND processes. I feel sorry for you that you keep flaunting your mind's limitations as if they were absolute truths and qualities to admire.

But it was ever thus.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Whatev.