you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LarrySwinger2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Thanks, I was very skeptical of it. Regardless, the impact was from explosives. There was a reinforcement at the exact spot where the airplane supposedly hit a few weeks before the event, that's when they planted them.

This is related to the WTC site, where objects, whether real or fake, were used to distract people from explosives. What's your stance on what hit the towers, if anything? I saw a video that said the damage was consistent with that caused by a missile.

[–]zyxzevn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The towers were hit by military versions of airplanes.
All pieces of evidence are matching with that conclusion.
The video Identify shows that the remains had specific structures that correspond with military upgrades of civilian planes. So they can fly faster.
They also look a bit wider on the bottom, because the wings are made a bit stronger.

During the flight they switched the civilian planes with the military planes, exactly at the radar black-spot.
And during that time the transponders were off, and later on again.
The transponder sends identification and location to all nearby control towers.
Civil Radars have trouble to reach over the horizon.
Military radars use flying radar stations (AWACS) or low frequency bands close to AM radio / HAM radio.

Switching of transponder codes was also used a few years ago by Israel to bomb Syria,
so Syria would think a civil plane was going their way.

The destruction of some airplanes was not a problem for the Pentagon, as they needed
to hide the 3.2 trillions. Or 12 trillions (Prof Skidmore). Depending on who you ask.