you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LarrySwinger2[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

I have and always will state, as a professional computer animator who worked in NYC from 1996 to 2004, it would have technically been VERY possible to fake the footage back then with a very capable small team with the resources necessary - however I just don't believe that to be the case.

I recall you emphasizing a different stance, namely that it would have been impossible at least to fake the live footage of the crashes, and that therefore you believe there were actual objects in the sky. This doesn't contradict what you're saying now (the conclusion is the same). But you're putting the emphasis in quite a different place now, which surprises me. Did I misread you in the past, or making a different point here?

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

The critical point is that all the LIVE videos were only from a distance and thus lower resolutions and shittier imagery - more of a dark silhouette of a plane in the sky. Obviously the animation teems would need a direct interception feed, all the proper gear, setups, etc, and a slight delay to render and re-feed. People watching on TV wouldn't notice a minute long delay. This would have been much harder to get correct on the fly than the second stage.

Perhaps you keyed into this: It would have been impossible to get a good version LIVE and close up.

It's alleged that there were insider plants all over the city who just happened to have their video cameras. Or in a city of millions some just had them. Regardless, whether they controlled all that footage or went and got it (and dealt with the witnesses) stage two would have been to add the planes to all that footage. They would have the luxury of time to get it reasonable correct. If their team of videographers had also gotten similar footage in advance from the same place and time they could then be 100 steps ahead already. There's a whole lot of other stuff that could have been done to make the pipeline effective.

The second wave of videos is not "live on air" affording them time to fudge them.

Regardless, IMO it was all real, but the story was not.

[–]humancorpse 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

how many people were on the ground watching this event unfold? yeah.

and now the muslims that pulled off this caper are determined to blame it on jewish people.

absolutely amazing.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

The Zionists organized it, including the Zionist Muslims.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

how about this theory, jews have controlled the muslim religion since the start.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I didn't think that was saying jews controlled christianity, but romans did?

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's not that clear cut. I have not read the book and it's been a while since I watched the doc.

Also worth checking out is Webster Tarpley on the history, middle ages onward, and anything but modern 21st century politics where he's mostly useless. Perhaps all of his work is poor, but the historical stuff seems insightful, plausible, and fills in holes to make sense in the long run.