Never forget that the lab leak was a “conspiracy theory” that the New York Times’ head Covid reporter called “racist.” If you think I’ll tire of recalling this, my friends, you are wrong.

Vrepit · 2023-05-01T04:59:53+00:00

You are cherry picking 1 of several hundred studies. I clearly see you. I can't help but understandably laugh a little at you. No offense, but surely you have practiced self introspection at some point and maybe to your chagrin understand what I speak of?

Perhaps a partner or someone intimate with you has already mentioned previously that you struggle in certain areas of your life that has affected the quality of your relationships with these people? We can see a microcosm of this play out in your social awkwardness in confronting uncomfortable facts. Your responses are waning on substance as you have found yourself on indefensible and shaky ground. It's ok Friend, just reflect now, breathe and as you now learn to let go with every exhale. Vrepit Sa.

Vrepit · 2023-04-29T04:28:56+00:00

The data that supports Ivermectin as being effective alone or in conjunction with other treatments is clearly spelled out in hundreds of studies with patients that I linked. You've crossed the Rubicon and have passed the point where it was better for you to just remain quiet. I'm very sorry to hear of your loss in this convo....at least you tried and maybe you were compensated for it whether that be tangible or more intangible like ego stroking. It's a good indicator of character to understand when to speak and when to remain silent. I will catch up with you later on a topic that your scripted responses have shown to be more reliable to you and give you another chance. Vrepit Sa.

Vrepit · 2023-04-27T17:22:56+00:00

It certainly does appear to have notable efficacy, particularly when used early. We really don't need to just rely on a handful of studies when doctors from all over the world have been using Ivermectin on covid patients and databased their findings which support that it is effective.

https://c19ivm.org

Vrepit · 2023-04-26T17:26:39+00:00

My comment was in the context of a flu virus. There's no need for embellishment on my original statement. Even though Ivermectin's antiviral properties have been previously established, with Sars-Cov being a recent concern, much more research has been done in clinical environments.

I'm not your research assistant and it appears you are not genuine or honest with your query. Any one else that has interest in Ivermectin's antiviral properties, can simply search for the studies on Pubmed.

Vrepit · 2023-04-26T03:26:56+00:00

I've used it a few times when I was experiencing an early flu onset that was making coworkers be bedridden for a week at a time. It literally stops a viral infection from propagating further within 6-8 hours...does not reverse it, but puts it into a limbo. I was back to work the next afternoon with minimal symptoms. The only side effect I had was drowsiness, which coffee fixed.

Vrepit · 2022-08-27T09:34:28+00:00

The khazar claimed that Christians love to molest children..along with some other pilpul gibberish

I asked whether per capita, if Christians were represented more than other religions such as Islam, Hinduism, Judaism or Atheism.

I appreciate your links, however, I'm getting conflicting information on whether this type of child abuse is more prevalent among religio types. Though I would have to proffer to start that child molestation/abuse is strictly forbidden in Christianity (as opposed to Islam and Judaism), so by engaging in this type of unambiguously forbidden behavior disqualifies that person as being a Christian and would be nothing more than a claim to be a member of that religious group. What I see more prevalent is that a stronger data-set narrative is that people who are likely to follow this type of molestation lifestyle will often put themselves into positions of power over children in order to live out their degenerate desires, and if being involved with youth via church is the easiest outlet, then that will be pursued. I've also noted that around 70% of countries with the highest rate of child abuse are a majority non-Christian as a follow up on my original question.

Most child abusers have one thing in common, and it's not piety—it's preexisting relationships with their victims. That includes priests and ministers and rabbis, of course, but also family members, friends, neighbors, teachers, coaches, scout leaders, youth-group volunteers, and doctors. According to federal studies, three quarters of abuse occurs at the hands of family members or others in the victim's "circle of trust." "The fundamental premise here is that those who abuse children overwhelmingly seek out situations where they have easy and legitimate access to children," he said. "These kinds of positions offer a kind of cover for these offenders."<

https://www.d2l.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/all_statistics_20150619.pdf

and a handful more studies if it matters.

Vrepit · 2022-08-27T05:04:16+00:00

But do tell, how do you Khazarians feel about this issue? I mean on a personal level, not the official position on it as ascribed here: https://jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/4672-corporal-punishment. Shalom ✡✡✡✡✡✡

Vrepit · 2022-08-27T04:36:24+00:00

What a rather amusing low iq reaction from you. Please cite your sources that actual Christians are engaged in "child rape/abuse" more than other religions such as Islam, Hinduism, Judaism or Atheism. Shalom ✡✡✡

Vrepit · 2022-08-10T10:08:46+00:00

Shhh..don't say anything but..."Well Aktually" doesn't know that the >majority< of male perps in the Baptist sex abuse link are gay. They are grown men molesting little boys, there's almost nothing more gay than that.

So cool it with your hateful Christianophobia.

If you molest children or engage in sodomy, by the Book, you are not Christian. Just a make believe one. Faggotry on the other hand does not have a rule of ethics nor therefore is there a limit to it's degeneracy.

Vrepit · 2022-04-30T08:56:39+00:00

No, little padwan. Race and ethnicity is a scientific/biological construct, anything else is an imaginative abstraction. There are proven genetic "clusters" with common traits, including physical and psychological similarities/propensities. This concludes that either through intentional reproductive strategy (eugenics) or genetic engineering, that this will enhance and bring these common traits to dominant expression. Why are you anti-science?

For example my little simpleton friend: If a group of people with a genetic proclivity for being a.) tall b.) musically gifted c.) tendency for obsessive compulsive disorder are intentionally preferred and then promoted via reproduction through 3-ish + generations, then their offspring will exhibit a greater than 50+ % tendency toward dominant expression of these 3 traits. You know this. Don't be so fking stupid and don't play me or anyone else for being as stupid as you're feigning to be.

Vrepit · 2022-04-23T18:32:32+00:00

You poor dear. Did you actually read the article? It essentially said that humans are more complex than dogs, therefore breeds/race/ethnicity is a social construct. They leaned heavily on nurture as opposed to nature to further obfuscate their forgone conclusion. Their politically motivated cobbled together conclusion did not proffer any detailed studies of selectively breeding homosapiens and they made it clear that it was a desperate attempt to discredit some scary racist boogeyman hiding in the closet.

What is Genetic Engineering of Humans and why would these 'authors' claim that it would not work?

Vrepit · 2022-04-23T17:44:58+00:00

eugenics, which was later proven to be unscientific.

What is "Selective Breeding"? Why is it extensively used in animal husbandry and in agriculture?

Vrepit · 2022-02-20T23:51:15+00:00

it's just that racist cops decided to ticket minorities more than whites.

You must of overlooked that according to research that blacks wear helmets less than Whites or Asians.