sorted by:
new
hottopinsightfulfun

The substack newsletter The Gay Agenda

by GayPartisan to /s/GayPartisan from (edwardhsebesta.substack.com)

NHS-funded clinic booklet encourages FTMs to be prostitutes and rape gay men by lunarstrain in LGBDropTheT

[–]GayPartisan 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are some clinics in Canada which push having sex without informed consent and give advice how to do it. I have two posts in my substack about it.

Political Lesbian is a concept that led to the concept of translesbianism. by GayPartisan in LGBDropTheT

[–]GayPartisan[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I didn't say that people can't change their mind. I didn't say which wave of feminism started it. I didn't say it was a religion. I didn't say that any movement didn't learn from its mistakes.

What I did say is that a certain faction of rad fems did push this and that this ideology opened a door for something to come back on them.

I really don't care for false-opposites and misdirection. That is when you argue A and someone says anti-B implying that you argued B. Perhaps you are not actually replying to me, but writing an apologetic for rad fems.

Political Lesbian is a concept that led to the concept of translesbianism.Discussion

by GayPartisan to /s/LGBDropTheT from (self.LGBDropTheT)

"yOu'Re NoT gAy YoU'rE pAnSeXuAl!", more enby dating horror. by artetolife in LGBDropTheT

[–]GayPartisan 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Pansexual is when people want some stuff and nonsense so they aren't just horny Gays like the rest of us, or they are some type of super being above lust. There original slogan gave away the game, which was, "Hearts Not Parts."

A Lexicon to satirize our opposition.Discussion

by GayPartisan to /s/LGBDropTheT from (self.LGBDropTheT)

Sunday Social - open chat! by [deleted] in LGBDropTheT

[–]GayPartisan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Snarking is fine. However, for some, that is all they do as their full program. I also plan not to get pulled into sexological and gender debates in terms of the theories. The whole history is that they constantly shift and are often wholesale overthrown. What I am looking at is how are they enabled to be in power, to have power. It comes out of the modern neoliberal university and their gender studies departments. What are the reasons is it supported so widely, why are we in a position of being a fighting minority. Argue about the gender identity theories if you want, I think that is probably important. I want to understand why we are arguing at all, when Gay men make up most of the LGBTQXYZ, and are the financial basis of the Pride Parades and the custmers of the ads that fund the Alphabet Soup press.

Andrew Doyle and Dennis Kavanagh discuss the gay fightback by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]GayPartisan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks.

The apps do plan to let trans decide who to ban.LGB Erasure

by GayPartisan to /s/LGBDropTheT from (self.LGBDropTheT)

Censorship Thursday - share your sub bans here! by NutterButterFlutter in LGBDropTheT

[–]GayPartisan 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I got kicked off Medium and had to do a quick download of all the articles I published. That is why I am on Substack. Substack has made it clear they aren't giving in to trans bullying.

Andrew Doyle and Dennis Kavanagh discuss the gay fightback by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]GayPartisan 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Does anyone have a link to his group?

Identities for sale. This guy is taking on the trans ultras, but he is doing it within a larger context.Colonization

by GayPartisan to /s/LGBDropTheT from (dennisnoelkavanagh.substack.com)

Sunday Social - open chat! by [deleted] in LGBDropTheT

[–]GayPartisan 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

One issue I see as undermining the effort to stop the replacement of homosexual with "homogender" is too much focus on the crazy assertions these trans ideologues make, and also just reacting reflexively.

I think it needs to be examined what empowered these trans ideologues such that they can repress the Lesbian and Gay communities. I think to some extent it is an assimilationist idea that being Lesbian or Gay is a private thing in a box, and we can lump trans in with other sexual minorities.

I also think there is a social worker complex of self interest. They want an expanding list of issues so they have an expanding list of social services. I call it Queer Inc. and I am just starting the idea.

I think we need to have a theoretical foundation, just rolling our eyes up at the latest excess isn't going to be enough.

Sunday Social - open chat! by [deleted] in LGBDropTheT

[–]GayPartisan 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I finished a lengthy review of an Advocate article pushing transman sex on the Gay community using a lot of rhetorical tactics. It was exhausting. Then I realized that the most important thing was the omission of the issue of pregnacy. I reviewed three articles in writing the short piece, and last night a 4th article pushing transman sex and realized that pregnancy and birth control is omitted. After this realization, I wondered how I didn't think of this before.

What this should tell you, is that in any area of research or writing often the obvious is right before you and you don't see it.

So I broke out this single topic which I think is very powerful exploding the pretenses of the "homogender" ideologues. Not everyone is going to read a 13-page breakdown of transman propaganda.

Pregnancy and "Gay" Transmen by xandit in LGBDropTheT

[–]GayPartisan 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am the author of this item. I am not allowed to post links according to Rule No. 5. I did a lengthy review of the article, but broke this out as a short piece. I am doing a lot of what I call either Gay Partisan or Gay centric writing.

Pregnancy and "Gay" Transmen by xandit in LGBDropTheT

[–]GayPartisan 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They just said I can't.

I really wish statistics would make a distinction between same-sex and gender identity people by dilsency in LGBDropTheT

[–]GayPartisan 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You need to go to the pollsters website. They actually do break it down. I agree with you that giving a percentage of LGBTQ+ isn't very meaningful.

Alex Cheves attack in the "Advocate" on Gay men not wanting to have sex with transmen. Shaming used.Men's Issues

by GayPartisan to /s/LGBDropTheT from (self.LGBDropTheT)

Pregnancy and "Gay" Transmen by xandit in LGBDropTheT

[–]GayPartisan 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks to Xandit for posting the link to my story. I got record readership. I wrote a detailed review of the "Advocate" article, but I decided to break out a short article on this one thing, since when i thought about it, other articles pushing Gay men to have sex with trans"men" also omitted the issue of pregnacy.

I have been writing about the trans excesses, but I want to see what is driving this whole push. I also deal with other groups which scold the Gay community for one thing or another. Let me read the rules. I do have other stuff to share.

RIP by usehername in TumblrInAction

[–]GayPartisan 21 insightful - 5 fun21 insightful - 4 fun22 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Some good news is that the BBC is pushing back against trans repression and the Guardian did some very even handed reporting on it. I think that the tide is turning and Reddit is behind the times.