We should make cities more walkable, less dependent on cars
submitted 20 days ago by P-38lightning from (i.imgur.com)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]ActuallyNot 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 20 days ago (5 children)
Walkability has shitloads of benefits.
But what's with the wolf in a sheep costume with the red and green rectangles around their eyes?
[–]NastyWetSmear 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 20 days ago (4 children)
I think it's a little confusing because the wolf being exposed is on the left and the text is above the other text, meaning you naturally want to read it first, but the idea is:
The innocent, green, good sheep is saying: Making cities walkable is great! But it's secretly an evil wolf is disguise who has another agenda behind it: Using communism!!
... I don't really understand how one relates to another. I think you could plan your city around foot traffic and still have a free market with little to no starvation, citizen oppressions and gulags, but I think that's the gist it's gunning for.
[–]WoodyWoodPeckerHah he he he hah! 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 20 days ago (3 children)
Zu vill live in apartments, zu vill eat de bugs, zu vill own nufin und zu will like it. -George Soros and other WEF members.
[–]NastyWetSmear 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 20 days ago (2 children)
So the insinuation is that the foot traffic focused city is designed to reduce ownership of things?
[–]WoodyWoodPeckerHah he he he hah! 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - 20 days ago (1 child)
You won't have room for them in a one-room apartment. You will rent everything you use.
[–]NastyWetSmear 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 19 days ago (0 children)
That kinda feels like extreme capitalism rather than communism, right? If I'm renting everything I own, someone is profiting, and it's not the people. Wouldn't the communist version be that I get a small, one room apartment and a number of goods assigned to me by the state?
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~4 users here now
view the rest of the comments →
[–]ActuallyNot 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]NastyWetSmear 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]WoodyWoodPeckerHah he he he hah! 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]NastyWetSmear 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]WoodyWoodPeckerHah he he he hah! 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]NastyWetSmear 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)