you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]YoMamma[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Interesting, if true. The number of trans people is so small that it would be a waste of money to try to appeal to them in the market. And I don't see any evidence in the article that points to references or anything I can check for accuracy.

I see that it's an 'extreme right' website, and considered unreliable, so that might explain their concerns about such a tiny market share.

[–]xoenix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Pathetic autogenerated hit piece. Jennifer Bilek is probably the world's leading authority researching and exposing the transhumanist money trail. Show me serious a correction or fact-check. I can probably ping her on Twitter and have her defend it personally if needed.

The industry (calling itself "LGBTQ") is worth $3.4T according to their own estimates. This includes the exploding market for surgeries, (and endless follow-up surgeries - each patient can be worth $1M extra over their lifetime,) manufacturing hormones to be doled out at every Planned Parenthood to any teen who walks in, insurance products, and in particular, the fast-growing surrogacy (AKA forced, designer birth) industry that the sterilized transhumanist children of today will need if they want to have kids. An industry ripe for exploitation.

All that said, it is remarkable that such an industry has grown in such a short time. It would lead one to think that the billionaires pushing this thing must be really driven by some intense desire or dark obsession of some kind.

[–]YoMamma[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I thought we were discussing the small group of transgender folks. We're not discussing all of LGBTQ++++, because that's a different series of arguments. Those who aren't worried about trans people are perhaps 96% of the world's population, give or take 10+ percentage points. If you want to argue that - because there is a financial incentive to reach a small group of trans people - therefore marketers will spend billions on it - this doesn't work because there aren't so many of those people. Hence there isn't much marketing for them. Is there expensive marketing for LGBTQ++++ people? Certainly. But the amount of that marketing for trans people is also small.

I could ask you the same question about Jennifer Bilek. Why does she care so much about these false assumptions about marketing for trans people? She's produced videos and articles with the same faulty argument. She promoting her content because she's paid by Youtube and The 11th Hour and other places for her opinion about marketing for trans people. Does this matter to anyone? Before the US Presidential election, the only strategies Trump and others will try to use are attacks on 'woke' and on immigration to the US. Investors are paying $billions to promote the war on woke, because they're unable to effectively protest against all of the Biden Administrations' and Democrats' successes. So they have to focus on hatred and fear. That's all they have. Jennifer Bilek helps that group by spreading her opinion, which is to hate marketing for rans people. Did that marketing or that tiny industry harm anyone? No. Is she an authority on the subject? If she doesn't understand basic human biology, the varieties of human bodies, and the different kinds of people world-wide, I doubt she knows anything much about trans people.

Hope this helps.

[–]xoenix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There isn't a while lot of money in actual LGB. The industry is for TQ+++. All the letters after the B are transhumanism. A corporate product, academically legitimized by queer Marxism.