Hello again, Saidit. I'm open to another round of questions if you guys are.

submitted by 369 from (self.whatever)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Mcheetah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Are you a woman?

[–]369[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Ahh, just like old times.

I find a lot of people who take this rhetorical route haven't come to understand the concept of nor integrated the Anima. By my estimation, this usually means they're struggling with their masculinity and aren't sure how to mesh the two polarities within themselves yet. Being an Intuitive myself, I find/found integrating the Anima to not be too difficult, and now that I'm more comfortable with the convergence, it makes it a lot easier to read people, forecast events, or learn a great deal more. I highly suggest it, just like I suggest not being so uncomfortable with women. Did you know gay men hate women far more than "incels"?

Although I'm not a woman, I thoroughly enjoy them in a variety of ways.

[–]Mcheetah 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

By my estimation, this usually means they're struggling with their masculinity and aren't sure how to mesh the two polarities within themselves yet. ...I suggest not being so uncomfortable with women. Did you know gay men hate women far more than "incels"?

I know what the Anima is, "a man's feminine side." But it's a massive leap of projection to assume someone pointing out an adult male who doesn't have an ounce of masculinity in them, must be "projection." By that logic, anyone who doesn't think Dylan Mulvaney is the manliest of men, must also be "projecting."

I never even made that assumption about you anyway; it was a joke question out of the blue because this site has no women. So I would've asked it to anyone. It had nothing to do with you. To quote Thanos, "I don't even know who you are." But way to spill the beans about your insecurity with yourself by leaning too much into a random question from someone who's never even seen you on the site before.

Next time just say, "No, I'm a faggot/trans" and it'd be a lot easier on yourself than revealing your panties fetish or your love for taking dick up the rear and sucking more cock than Kim Kardashian, but trying to project that onto others as a deflection. Jesus fucking Christ dude; way to snitch on yourself to a rando on the internet... If this is a joke, then you went way too far into it. Never go Full Faggot.

And with that, I'm going to go back to ignoring you now. Sorry I even poked the tranny nest.

[–]369[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wait, so your question was just a joke comprised of veiled third-party commentary on how there are not any women on Saidit, but my willingness to just move along and try to issue a stimulating response that isn't necessarily a jab at you is somehow me accusing you of "projection"? If I was going to say "you're projecting" I would have just said that. This is very odd behavior and it's interesting that you'd choose to handle things this way.

The modern fetish with "transsexuality" completely gets the ancient idea of combining the sexes within the individual wrong. Just as Jung modernized the idea in his explanations, it isn't a physical idea, but expressing it artistically in a physical form is what we should consider a veiled reference. Jesus, like Dionysus and plenty of others, was depicted with feminine features. It wasn't because he's a tranny or something. Instead, it's a suggestion that he had a personality that transcended the outward expressions of his genetics and was capable of utilizing the feminine features that extend beyond physical within his personality or capabilities.

I never even made that assumption about you anyway

It's weird that you tried to make it seem like I made the assumption about you though. What if I was just brushing off your imagined hazing and decided to instead just try to give a stimulating response?