you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]369[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wait, so your question was just a joke comprised of veiled third-party commentary on how there are not any women on Saidit, but my willingness to just move along and try to issue a stimulating response that isn't necessarily a jab at you is somehow me accusing you of "projection"? If I was going to say "you're projecting" I would have just said that. This is very odd behavior and it's interesting that you'd choose to handle things this way.

The modern fetish with "transsexuality" completely gets the ancient idea of combining the sexes within the individual wrong. Just as Jung modernized the idea in his explanations, it isn't a physical idea, but expressing it artistically in a physical form is what we should consider a veiled reference. Jesus, like Dionysus and plenty of others, was depicted with feminine features. It wasn't because he's a tranny or something. Instead, it's a suggestion that he had a personality that transcended the outward expressions of his genetics and was capable of utilizing the feminine features that extend beyond physical within his personality or capabilities.

I never even made that assumption about you anyway

It's weird that you tried to make it seem like I made the assumption about you though. What if I was just brushing off your imagined hazing and decided to instead just try to give a stimulating response?