Sexual loneliness: A neglected public health problem?
submitted 6 months ago by Entropick from (archive.is)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Entropick[S] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun - 6 months ago (8 children)
66% of females between the ages of 18 - 30 are only having sex with <5% of males. This means that over 95% of all males are competing for the opportunity to bed the remaining 33% of females. At no point in recorded human history has it ever been this bad, tens of millions of young fighting age men having nothing to live for; they are dangerous dissidents that must be culled which is why they are going to send you to a frozen ditch in Eastern Ukraine, a muggy swamp in Taiwan and to the deserts of Iran for you to die.
YES, THESE ARE REAL QUOTES FROM THE US ARMY WAR COLLEGES OFFICIAL PRESS RELEASE!
[–]Clown_Chan 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun - 6 months ago* (2 children)
Good, for the sake of humanity, only the best, high quality men should reproduce. It would be much less disabled, ugly and retarded children this way.
Heck, maybe then it would be less leftists, homos and troons....
[–]winkot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 6 months ago (1 child)
Top 5% of men in terms of being in the winner category, not actual superiority.
We're getting exactly what you just said you don't want.
We're getting a short 5/10 parasite who is too afraid to disagree with any left wing issue his woman supports.
[–]Clown_Chan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 6 months ago (0 children)
That's only because women are guilted by society and incels into dating ugly, inferior, broke soymen or else we are called shallow gold diggers and Chad chasers. So many women give in into pressure and date ugly manlets, producing ugly or disabled children.
[–]bucetao6969 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 6 months ago (1 child)
This means that over 95% of all males are competing for the opportunity to bed the remaining 33% of females
I'm pretty sure they aren't exactly competing, they're just like... trying to be happy without relying on women. There's no way that all of the 95% of males would settle for a fatty or a troon.
It explains why there's a lot of male suicides but it also explains why there's less marriages. In the end, men will overcome this but women will be left behind.
[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 6 months ago (0 children)
the y gene caused instability plus the can-do attitude probably accounts for male suicide rate
[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 6 months ago (2 children)
66% of females between the ages of 18 - 30 are only having sex with <5% of males
Do you understand that your math doesn't add up? Are you spewing numbers out of your insane butt?
[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 6 months ago (0 children)
why do you think those numbers don't add up? I do think he may have made up the numbers or just estimated them, but they do add up. But he should go with the numbers in the study he linked to
https://archive.ph/QqVtm
[–]Entropick[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 6 months ago (0 children)
Not my work genius
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~8 users here now
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Entropick[S] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun - (8 children)
[–]Clown_Chan 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun - (2 children)
[–]winkot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]Clown_Chan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]bucetao6969 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Entropick[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)