Do not engage with bots

submitted by winkot from (self.whatever)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (25 children)

ActuallyBot

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

The point I made was backed up with a link showing the term "gax-max" had never been used on this site. This is refutation or counter-argument on the pyramid of debate.

You have responded with name-calling.

Dragging down the conversation on the pyramid of debate is against saidit values.

I have reported your comment, and encourage you to do better in the future.

[–]Armedpleb 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

You got offended so easily just by me calling you ActuallyBot? Maybe you are a bot! I've been called worse things and didn't get offended.

If you wanna succeed in reporting and banning people, go back to reddit. At least everyone there will agree with your opinions. I came to saidit to escape that shithole and I got tired of being silenced and banned all the time.

I don't understand why you insist on coming to saidit when you'll be completely fine on reddit. If I argued with you on reddit, my comments would be removed and I would be banned. On saidit, everyone has the right to argue and disagree with what you say, but not on reddit. On reddit, whatever liberals say is absolute and no one is allowed to be against what they say.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

I'm not offended.

But you offered nothing of value in your comment with respect to the material, and that is bad for saidit, and boring for this conversation.

On saidit, everyone has the right to argue and disagree with what you say

However, rational argument with evidence is well regarded and name calling is not.

I encourage you to improve your comments by following saidit values. Particularly by being conscious of the pyramid of debate when you comment, and always trying to lift the conversation.

[–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Lol, you called all my evidence as "fake" even if it is video evidence. Video evidence showing fraud and corruption being committed is more than rational. Banning anyone you disagree with is what is bad for saidit because then the existance of saidit is pointless if it is no different than reddit. You'll find what you're looking for on reddit and you'll get to report and ban whoever you want, even for something as silly as "name calling".

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Lol,

Chortle.

you called all my evidence as "fake" even if it is video evidence.

I called your project veritas videos fake. That's because they are.

But that's also obvious because we know from the massive investigation by the GOP that there's no evidence to support impeachment.

Banning anyone you disagree with is what is bad for saidit because then the existance of saidit is pointless if it is no different than reddit.

Saidit values don't include banning anyone you disagree with. They do include banning people who continually drag down the discussion of the pyramid of debate, such as by name calling in response to a comment with linked evidence supporting the point.

[–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"But that's also obvious because we know him the massive investigation by the GOP that there's no evidence to support impeachment."

Who's "him"? Your sentence seems kind of strange.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks. Corrected.

[–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

I show you video evidence of liberals & democrats confessing & committing fraud & corruption on camera. You show me written fallacies.

It's not just Biden, plenty of other liberals & democrats have confessed and committed fraud and corruption like Scott Foval (on camera of course). Did you not check the other video links? What about the non-Veritas videos?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/xSlYEo6QtGkG/

I am starting to think maybe you are a bot if you see video evidence as "fake" just because you said so and regardless of the crimes being confessed or committed on camera but written articles are true just because you said so.

I am suprised you being called ActuallyBot triggered you so easily. With all the profanities and slurs I've seen on saidit, I guarantee you've been called worse things and probably didn't succeed in banning anyone, unless its on reddit.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

I show you video evidence of liberals & democrats confessing & committing fraud & corruption on camera.

I've explained several times that project veritas videos are manipulated.

Project Veritas is an American far-right activist group founded by James O'Keefe in 2010. The group produces deceptively edited videos of its undercover operations, which use secret recordings in an effort to discredit mainstream media organizations and progressive groups.

You seem to be having trouble understanding that a manipulated video is not hard evidence.

You realize that the idea of manipulation of videos is to be misleading, right?

What about the non-Veritas videos?

I responded to the video about Biden.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/xSlYEo6QtGkG/

Yes. Sometimes people might send one member of a family to put the votes in a ballot box, instead of all driving down separately.

Each vote is checked off on the role. One car stopping and putting several votes in the box is not indicative of fraud, and it's certainly not indicative of fraud by liberals & democrats.

Recall that the Maricopa county recount increased Biden's margin by 360 votes compared to the official results.

[–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

ttps://www.bitchute.com/video/xSlYEo6QtGkG/

How do you know they are turning in ballots for family members and are not just voting multiple times? With so many ballots being stuffed, I doubt their family is that big.

Using hidden cameras to reveal liberals confessing about committing fraud on camera has nothing to do with manipulating anything.

Wikipedia thinks Antifa & BLM is protests are "nonviolent/peaceful"

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antifa_(United_States)

"Most antifa political activism is nonviolent" " The slogan "Black Lives Matter" itself remains untrademarked by any group.[8] Despite being characterized by some as a violent movement, the overwhelming majority of its public demonstrations have been peaceful"

How can you expect me to believe wikipedias written articles?

"nonviolent/peaceful protest" my ass

https://www.bitchute.com/video/PifrRn2neY9h/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5VzORb57J8s1/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/i4RFJlq3QZjY/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/n3h0Q7tqt0E4/

Minneapolis

https://www.bitchute.com/video/f0rH3zsAXPRP/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/jbQmGLzZXRL7/

Wisconsin

https://www.bitchute.com/video/afDH8YHlTEkz/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/-INtMzml9HQ

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

How do you know they are turning in ballots for family members and are not just voting multiple times?

I don't know, but voting multiple times doesn't work, because each person on the role can only vote once, and the signatures are checked.

My point is that your video does not prove or even suggest voter fraud, 6 extra votes wouldn't change the result, and there were more false votes for Trump then Biden in Maricopa.

Using hidden cameras to reveal liberals confessing about committing fraud on camera has nothing to do with manipulating anything.

Agree. However that's not what protect veritas does. They then edit the videos to make it look like people are saying things that they didn't say.

nonviolent/peaceful protest" my ass

You've got some videos of riots?

I don't see how that proves that less than 93% of blm protests were peaceful.

Please show your estimate of what proportion of BLM protests were peaceful, if you think you have evidence that the 93% figure is wrong.

[–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Dozens of voters voting multiple times WILL change the votes. Where's your proof of fraudulent votes for Trump in Maricopa?

I've shown you the same links of Antifa and BLM burning down cities at least 3 times, but you never seem to respond when I show them to you. Is your bot brain confused?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/PifrRn2neY9h/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5VzORb57J8s1/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/i4RFJlq3QZjY/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/n3h0Q7tqt0E4/

Minneapolis

https://www.bitchute.com/video/f0rH3zsAXPRP/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/jbQmGLzZXRL7/

Wisconsin

https://www.bitchute.com/video/afDH8YHlTEkz/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/-INtMzml9HQ/

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Dozens of voters voting multiple times WILL change the votes.

No. To switch AZ, you would need dozens of voters voting hundreds of times.

And that wouldn't work, because more than one vote for someone on the role would be detected.

And more obviously, a car pulling up to a booth and putting more than one envelope into the ballot drop box is not evidence of fraud. It's evidence that they've running down to the ballot box for more than one person.

I've shown you the same links of Antifa and BLM burning down cities at least 3 times, but you never seem to respond when I show them to you. Is your bot brain confused?

Is see a video of buildings on fire. In some cases with a live streaming app either real or superimposed.

It's not a lot of evidence of anything. Much less that it represents BLM protests. Much less that it represents more than 7% of BLM protests.

I thought I'd made that clear enough the first time. It's not as difficult to understand as you're trying to pretend.

You claim that the "93% of blm protests were peaceful" figure is wrong. To show that you need to give your estimate and justify why you think its more accurate.

All you've done is link to videos of unverifiable origin.

Is your bot brain confused?

At least one of ours is.

[–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

"What about the non-Veritas videos?

I responded to the video about Biden.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/xSlYEo6QtGkG/"

Another weird sentence. You didn't have to say "I responded to the video about Biden"

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I'm not following what your issue is.

I responded to the video about Biden in this comment:https://saidit.net/s/politics/comments/bmra/hard_evidence_warranting_the_impeachment_of_joe/14c3o

How would you expect that to be said, and why does it make a difference?

[–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The longer the conversation goes, the more strange your grammar and sentences become. Sometimes they're non-sensical. I am starting to think you are a bot. I don't want to waste my breath arguing against a bot. Tell your master to stop using a bot like a coward and actually log in like a human being so we can have a more proper conversation. Otherwise, from now on I am going to ignore your replies. I should've listened, never engage with bots. What a huge waste of my time.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You're not making any sense.

I clarified why I said "I responded to the video about Biden", and what it meant. I did that because in the GGP comment you seemed to have trouble understanding.

It's not as hard to follow the conversation as you're trying to make out. Not if you're a thinking human anyway.