So, the first listing that implores the various likes, where does it say that "sometimes men like women" or "Sometimes women like men?" Is this not an option?

Why does the introduction touch on the standard insecurities that a child approaching adolescence or beginning puberty feels and attempts to offer explanation? The entire introduction reads from the viewpoint of someone who is naturally confused.

It then offers membership to an exclusive club that is fun, free and inspirational. What confused near-teen wouldn't trade all their insecurities away for such membership? This is indoctrination, nothing more. I saw it myself with my uber religious surroundings growing up, everything was about indoctrination. And this is absolutely no different at all.

The interaction between the mother and her son was disturbing. Because the Mother suggested that the boy will enjoy kissing girls, the writer wanted to call social services on them? For real? But if the Mother said, "Oh yes, you will enjoy sucking cock!" will that have been OK?

What the pie chart shows (and rather poorly and inaccurately) is the ages of when people go through puberty. It again is pure propaganda designed to work and amuse young people.

I did rather enjoy the part about the trans people taking hormones. In a history of time to come, I feel that these passages will serve as a rather grimacing reminder of what the 2020s people got up to. Rather like when you read about the use of leaches, trepanation or lobotomy, I feel people of the future will look back at these tomes with their childlike appearance in a bid for acceptance as the shuddering and frightful things that they are.

Seriously this is not an acceptable thing for people to read. It is the pure indoctrination and resemblance to the target audience's own feelings they will naturally have at the time of pubescence. And believe me, I have read things like this before. An (ex) friend once gave me some literature about a white power organisation he was in - also why I chose not to associate with him anymore. But the literature itself was fascinating. It was compelling, targeted and befitted its audience well. Whomever had written it had done so with an intelligence that it could have won marketing awards. This book to me is absolutely no different. It is designed for one purpose only. It was designed to reach young white men who felt that they had gotten a raw deal, unsuccessful professionally and in school life, hard done by and were particularly in areas with a highly diverse community, especially where those people seemed to be in good order financially, such as shop owners, landlords, etc. And, just like this book, it included truthisms. That is, if you can say one thing that we all know to be true, you can take that truth on a little ride to something else that you can claim has corollary with that truthism and make that true too. Reading the first 20 or so pages of this book, I may as well have been reading that white power literature all them years ago, just like I may as well have been reading the Christian indoctrination childrens' books when I was young.

The people around it and the marketing materials do not change. Just the ideologies and the target audiences.

Sure, one thing is not like the other, I don't view a typical Christian or even gay person as an insidious person as someone screaming out heil hitler 80 years after the event. But I do view the indoctrination as such as insidious and the fact that it targets children to me is sick-inducing. Heterosexuality is the default for a reason. It's how humans procreate! To quote some comedian, us heteros, we fucking make you!

Any parent wants the best for their children and in these times of hardship, those lucky enough to be able to factor in children financially want even more the best for that child. Then this book comes out that preaches, indoctrinates and absolutely insists on fucking with their minds to the point of having boys cutting off their penises or girls chopping off their tits, that to me is harmful and fucked up. I have yet to see an innocent trans, they are all of the same mentality. Just like the white power lot or any religious group, they all want people to be as fucked up as they are.

To put it bluntly, if anyone ever comes near my child with this bullshit under the pretence of "it's just information if they want it", they know what they're doing. And they know what I will do in response. I'll cut their genitalia off for them, no surgery needed. I just won't be as delicate about it!

Added, you also need only think about how neo-trans people gained their acceptance in the first place. To my memory, there were always trans people. They kept to themselves and were amusing to see in public on the extreme rare occasion that you might see a bloke walking around dressed up as some 17th Century woman figure. Neo trans are entirely different. They are ugly, usually unintelligent and use every possible mouthpiece to preach about trans activism.

They realised that membership into the LGBT club would be easy and the simplest way for them to enjoy the protections that club contained as well as defence from any naysayers. Now that they have essentially all but hijacked that club and used it to its own ends, the neo-trans realise that in order to gain even more acceptance and to create more of themselves (indoctrination), kids are the easiest to target, the least experienced and if a child demands to be identified as trans, the parents will usually have little option but to work with that child about that issue, whether accepting it or getting treatment for their obvious gender dysphoria or attempting to locate the source of the indoctrination and cutting it off (which is what should happen).

By barraging into the LGBT club and enjoying those protections, they have coerced schools and other authority figures not only to protect them, but also encourage their efforts to indoctrinate whoever they want to for fear of extreme reprisal.

Neo trans is a real movement with little in terms of legitimacy at its heart and a lot in terms of mental health issues - extreme mental health issues. Its material is targeted and the fact that they are not only permitted but even encouraged to engage with children without their parents knowledge - actively protected by schools too - is extremely scary. Putting thoughts and brainwashing children outside of the standard national curriculums is why parents are very very rightfully angry.

You cannot pass off the efforts of the neo-trans as simple a person coming of age and deciding they prefer same-sex relationships, insert hard road of realisation and self acceptance here, this is indoctrination and there is a huge difference. And this is what the neo-trans are doing. And you know what? I am far more travelled than you or your kind. I know a trans person who has been trans for nearly 40 years nearing his 60s now. I've worked with him for about 12 of those years. He doesn't boast about trans-ness every chance he gets, he doesn't resent anyone referring to him as he or she, doesn't resent people using his male or female name, has absolutely no demand for people to go mad with pronouns. And he really - really - hates neo-trans. Because the neo-trans have aligned people like him into that same category of targeting children, it has pushed him (and those he does trans things with) very much more into the shadows.

So a typical melting pot where people in the LGBT community that hold the same letter don't like neo-trans. And that little stunt where the neo-trans demanded Lesbians accept men who dress as women as sexual equal and excluding them from their own club? Fucking priceless. The left truly does eat itself.

The thing is, most people recognise you neo-trans types and what you are up to. And all I can say is, you will not enjoy these same protections for long. And certainly not from me. Frankly, I am smarter than you and I have seen far more than you have.