you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Oxford dictionary gives me: "the action by a pedophile of preparing a child for a meeting, especially via an internet chat room, with the intention of committing a sexual offense."

RAINN group gives: "One tool common to those who sexually abuse kids is grooming: manipulative behaviors that the abuser uses to gain access to a potential victim, coerce them to agree to the abuse, and reduce the risk of being caught."

It seems to me that this is a common definition: the person needs to be sexualizing with the intent of doing abuse, rather than just sexualizing in general.

Again, I am in agreement with you on this issue of sex teaching and LGBT agendas. Schools have no business sexualizing and indoctrinating kids especially kindergartners ffs. I just don't fully agree with the word choice.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You should agree with the word choice both because it is accurate and it makes the gr00mers seethe at being called out.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol, I do like that it pisses them, I can't deny it.

I just feel like rational discussion of why Kindergarteners don't need to learn about trannies and masturbating is more likely to persuade those people thinking wrongly than insinuating they are pedophiles.

This reminds me of the way dems call everyone bigots and 'dont say gay bill', resorting to inflammatory hyperbole. (Yes the dems do it worse). I worry about the health of our country when both sides use these tactics, it is not encouraging people on either side of the political spectrum to be reasonable or rational. I don't think this polarization has been good for the country or the people in it, and I don't think it changes peoples minds.