One step at a time can seem innocuous if done with care. All the steps together? Yeah nah, they're grooming the kids in USA schools

submitted by iamonlyoneman from (media.greatawakening.win)

all 10 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Its certainly indoctrination and cultural brainwashing, but I'm not sure grooming is accurate. A groomer tries to sexualize a child so THEY can have sex with them.The people writing the textbooks and curriculums are not the teachers and are not themselves trying to have sex with the kids. The intent is clearly to make kids accept LGBT morality, and I agree it is inappropriate to teach sexuality to K-3rd graders, but this is not technically grooming. To be grooming the teacher would have to decide themselves to teach the sexual material, and then try to prey on the child they sexualized. The sexualization needs to be connected to an attempt to prey on the sexualized child, or it isnt grooming.

I agree this is all bad, but I don't agree that the word choice of 'grooming' is accurate, even if it is effective at riling people up against something I do not like

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

False. Your too-narrow definition is the thing keeping you from realizing the truth here.

groom

v.tr.

  1. To prepare, as for a specific position or purpose

https://ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=grooming

They are getting the children ready to fuck adults before they are ready to fuck anyone. All this gender woo-woo is just a foot in the door.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Oxford dictionary gives me: "the action by a pedophile of preparing a child for a meeting, especially via an internet chat room, with the intention of committing a sexual offense."

RAINN group gives: "One tool common to those who sexually abuse kids is grooming: manipulative behaviors that the abuser uses to gain access to a potential victim, coerce them to agree to the abuse, and reduce the risk of being caught."

It seems to me that this is a common definition: the person needs to be sexualizing with the intent of doing abuse, rather than just sexualizing in general.

Again, I am in agreement with you on this issue of sex teaching and LGBT agendas. Schools have no business sexualizing and indoctrinating kids especially kindergartners ffs. I just don't fully agree with the word choice.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You should agree with the word choice both because it is accurate and it makes the gr00mers seethe at being called out.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol, I do like that it pisses them, I can't deny it.

I just feel like rational discussion of why Kindergarteners don't need to learn about trannies and masturbating is more likely to persuade those people thinking wrongly than insinuating they are pedophiles.

This reminds me of the way dems call everyone bigots and 'dont say gay bill', resorting to inflammatory hyperbole. (Yes the dems do it worse). I worry about the health of our country when both sides use these tactics, it is not encouraging people on either side of the political spectrum to be reasonable or rational. I don't think this polarization has been good for the country or the people in it, and I don't think it changes peoples minds.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

They ARE grooming them so they can have sex with them. They are trying to change society in a way that will make it easier to sexually assault all children so that there are far more opportunities for them to do it.

It is like bike thieves making bike locks illegal. You are simply not getting the big picture to see how their propaganda directly enables thier own sexual gratification. But it is simply one step removed from an immediate groomer-victim relationship. The groomers work together to groom all chikdren, and the victims are taken from that pool of vulnerable, and now primed for assault, children.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

They ARE grooming them so they can have sex with them. They are trying to change society in a way that will make it easier to sexually assault all children so that there are far more opportunities for them to do it.

I think this is true in some cases. I also think the vast majority of people accepting this agenda have just been brainwashed by the liberal media into thinking this is OK, and that they are just being 'unbigots'. Yes there are likely some sick fucks pushing this agenda out of sick self interest, but I do not think half of the country wants to rape kids, they are just stupid and hypnotized by their propagandists.

I have liberal family members who support this nonsense out of a mistaken belief that this is just the non-bigoted thing to do because thats what the New York Times, NBC, and their favorite authors tell them is true, not because they are sick pedophiles. These people need access to good information and rational discourse to have their minds changed, calling them all pedo's isnt going to convince them. My family really thought the Dont Say Gay bill really said that, and changed their minds when I showed them that all it did was prevent Sex curriculums for Kindergarteners. They understood this was reasonable, and that they were being gaslit, and no longer support this bill. Ditto for the Trans surgery and puberty blockers for minors.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

because thats what the New York Times, NBC, and their favorite authors tell them is true, not because they are sick pedophiles

If you kill for the benefit of someone else are you not a murderer?

If these people are being called groomers and they don't care maybe you don't know them as well as you think. Pedophiles don't advertise thier desires.

When so many people are screaming about how harmful this is and they still continue with it then it's time for you to wake up and realize they aren't good people. You can't claim ignorance at this point

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

When so many people are screaming about how harmful this is and they still continue with it then it's time for you to wake up and realize they aren't good people. You can't claim ignorance at this point

I don't think you understand how uninformed some of these people are. My parents read the New York Times everyday, and watch MSNBC news and thats all the sources of information they have besides their friends who read and watch the same shit. They thought people saying it was harmful were 'right wing extremist conspiracy theorist homophobes' because their news told them so. When I directed them to real facts and non-propaganda sources, they very quickly changed their opinion on these issues. My parents aren't pedophiles, they are just liberals who live in an echo chamber. I live in California, there are a lot of people like this here.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So how do you tell the difference between a groomer and a non groomer when they are both pushing a policy of grooming?