Hey guys I think I found the problem

submitted by ChimpGoyGirl from (pic8.co)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

OK - I'll look into this. I would think that intelligence agencies can easily hire editors to delete and change information. Much of the rest of the site might not be of interest to them.

If in due course there is a reliable link that can offer some evidence of this, I would welcome it. I don't need to see it at the moment.

Moreover, the KGB manipulated much of wikileaks.org several years ago. For example, specific information about the 'Panama Papers' is missing. A lazy link on wikilinks role in publishing them here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Papers

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It's not just about changing information. It's also about keeping views out or limiting the context and information enough to be virtually useless. Not to mention the way they gang up on users to kick them out.

I was banned in 2016 for a year for being "another polite truther". I wasn't trying to change the 9/11 page or even the 9/11 conspiracy page. I was simply trying to correct major errors on the 9/11 Truther Movement page. If authoritative sources say you were born in 1870 you can't correct the page unless you have another authoritative source to validate the correction. That's just one of the ways they keep lies going.

There's no shortage of documentation on the rigging and corruption of Wikipedia - but you won't likely find much of it in the corporate media. It's mutual masturbation.

Russia had self-interest reasons to mess with the Panama Papers. Not legit reasons, so far as the truth goes. Do not be confused though. WikiLeaks is VERY different than Wikipedia. Just as WikiSpooks is different than both of them.