you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Whether someone is religious or not doesn't change the fact that evolution as it is generally taught has some major logical flaws.

https://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/ten-major-flaws-of-evolution-a-refutation/

https://www.wired.com/2014/12/fantastically-wrong-thing-evolution-darwin-really-screwed/

https://evolutionnews.org/2012/07/what_are_the_to_1/

As a side note: Darwin had been corresponding with another scientist who turned over all his notes to Darwin, who then combined all of their writings and published it under his name. The other scientist was described as somewhat meek and one who shunned the limelight. This happens in science more often than we think.

Later: I'm surprised that no one has mentioned Richard Dawkins whose god is perhaps Darwin. I consider him a brilliant, bleeding butthole. I have seen him deliver a lecture in person and it did not change my opinion of him.

[–]whereswhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I would pay about tree fiddy to watch you debate Richard Dawkins. He would eat you alive.

[–]hennaojichan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am quite sure he would. As I said, he is brilliant but an asshole. I am not challenging him to a debate.