Pornhub bought ads on /r/nofap, in violation of Reddit policy. Cruelly taunting addicts who were trying to quit. After a brief blackout, her account is active again. Of course Gawker Media punches down and ridicules the addicts, an act of bullying.

submitted by Chipit from (internet.gawker.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Markimus 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

You can come up with any nonsense you want, doesn't change the reality of law. Obscene images and political speech clearly aren't anything like each other, only a libertarian could think something this braindead.

[–]Jesus 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Libertardian.

[–]flugegeheimen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You can come up with any nonsense you want

You are basically going "lalalala I don't hear you!!".

However you have some point with "Obscene images and political speech clearly aren't anything like each other". Yes, idea about what is and isn't obscenity is even more flimsy ephemeral bullshit than political\hate speech, so his argument about free speech (the one you frantically dismissed in the first sentence) is even more applicable to obscenity.

[–]bald-janitor 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Lolbertarian