The biggest flaw with the pyramid of debate

submitted by Shitskinned_Faggot from self.whatever

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bobbobbybob 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

post proof, when they (without fail) then sperg about why the proof isn't proof, call them out for not debating in good faith, call them (leftist) faggot cunts and tell them to fuck off.

Well, that's what I do. Might throw a 'kike' in there too if they demonstrate the bad faith debate tactics of our noseful fifth columners.

Lots of words added in, to make sure the insults are woven into a level 1/2 respone and you are gold and they are crying that they can't downvote.

[–]magnora7 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Or just drop the name-calling that drags the quality of discussion downward, and instead ignore them entirely?

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

aw, but I obtain great pleasure from that. I also generally wait a little before name calling.