you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

use the search function, shill

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Stop calling me a shill.

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

then stop shilling jesuitism 24/7

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Please provide link I'm shilling Jesuitism. I literally promoted a book exposing the Jesuits role in Hollyweird.

If you think I somehow knew CNI was partly owned by former CIA agents, which I did not, it was only when a user let me know, did I realize it, and nevertheless, that article still stands on its own, that I agree with it that we should not be giving Israel trillions of dollars.

**PS: if the link shilling perloff was Letsrollforums, whoch is a forum like saidit.net, who would I know it shilled Perloff, which I still don't know if it does. As for the owner of that site, guy banned me for not showing my IP address, which was very odd. So, I'm not a user there anymore. There is also simon shack, who does push disinformation but his posts on mock vicsims is markedly interesting. I still think he is also part of the disinformation network as well.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay, I found one more post where you mention Roth, who has been exposed as a CIA infiltrator, and that's not even her real name. I'll find the link and send it to you.

Again on that post I also linked Letsrollforums. Is that the shill site? Because again, in that post as well, you and I have a reasonable conversation and we both agreed that the women, ConspiracyTheorista who said Rockefeller did 9/11 which I don't doubt he played a part in, she then went on to shill the right left paradigm, exclaiming that Trump would drain the swamp. You agreed she was a shill. Her attack on Roth was legitimate. What I mean, is that controlled oppositions are best when they actually expose truth, and slowly add-in disinformation. So, ConspiracyTheorista had plenty of amazing videos exposing the Boston Bombing and many of the 9/11 shills but then out of nowhere starts shilling Judy Wood, who I personally believe is part of the cognitive disinformation program. Conspiracytheorista attacking Roth doesn't give Roth a free pass. Because in cognitive infiltration movements infighting is a tactic, that means the shills expose other shills to further balkanize the movements.

It is ingenious. Infighting works to Balkanize the movement. Read David Ray Griffen's book, Cognitive Infiltration.

Again, you can research Griffen and see if you agree with his reviews because he does have quite left leaning views, nevertheless, this book illustrates how the CIA works to infiltrate the 9/11 truth movement.